September 2nd, 2012 | By Glen Hiemstra | Posted in Cities Book | Comments Off

The city, the future, and you – be the change

This is Part 4 of Chapter 2 of our book on the future of cities, being written with Dennis Walsh. Our plan is to publish a new book blog nearly every day for the next couple of months. We will publish them both here on futurist.com and on dothefuture.com. Later we will compile the blogs into an e-book.

We are debating the eventual title. We started with two choices: “Downtown” and “Shine…The Rebirth of American Cities.” Which do you like? We hope you will find the subject of interest and follow this book in serial form. A reader has suggested, “City Transformation?” So far, “Downtown” with a subtitle is leading. What do you think?

—————————————————-
CHAPTER TWO – Part 4
by Dennis Walsh and Glen Hiemstra

50 years ago the first group of Freedom Riders boarded a bus in Washington, D.C., and headed south to lead the charge against American racial segregation. Their plan was to defy Southern social order by traveling as an interracial group through Southern cities before ending their tour in New Orleans. The Freedom Rides took a step toward doing what they felt was right at great personal risk and with no guarantee of success.

Others joined them in “Doing the right thing”. And it wasn’t long before the environmental science came into the emerging social movement. News of the Vietnam War shocked America with stories of birth defects and environmental poisoning caused by chemical defoliation of Vietnam’s jungle. There were protests against Dow Chemical recruiters on campus. Nixon devoted his 1969 State of the Union message to the environment, signing the National Environmental Policy Act saying that “the 1970s absolutely must be the years when America pays its debts to the past by reclaiming the purity of its air, its water, and its living environment. It is literally now or never.” Can you imagine a political leader saying that today, and meaning it? They will, someday, but only when public pressure rises again.

It was 1970, the same year as the anti-Vietnam Moratorium and Earth Day took off, led by a new generation of students less revolutionary than the SDS. New environmental organizations were created to lobby and advocate within the system: the Environmental Defense Fund, the Natural Resources Defense Council, and the League of Conservation Voters. There was an incident involving the Love Canal in Niagara Falls, New York. Buried toxic waste forced entire neighborhoods to be abandoned. A few years later, dioxin contamination forced the evacuation of Times Beach, Missouri. And by the latter half of the 1980s, the global chemical industry knew it was in trouble, its environmental reputation in tatters.

Against this cultural backdrop, American cities were in a slump. Downtown storefronts were failing. Industries were down sizing. Shopping centers were expanding on the outskirts of the city. Suburbs grew, freeways expanded, bus and rail lines died, the great hollowing out of cities was nearly complete.

Influential feminist writer and urban planner, Jane Jacobs saw this coming. Jacobs became involved in urban activism, spearheading local efforts to oppose the top-down neighborhood clearing and highway building championed by New York City Parks. Jacobs became the chairman of the Joint Committee to Stop the Lower Manhattan Expressway, in reaction to Moses’ plans to build a highway through Manhattan’s Washington Square Park and West Village.

To Jacobs, cities were living beings and ecosystems. She saw each element of a city – sidewalks, parks, neighborhoods, government, economy – functioning together synergistically just like natural ecosystems. Modernist urban planners of the time seemed to reject people living in complex communities. They often preferred to separate residential, industrial and commercial.

Jacobs disagreed with them. She was an urbanist, an activist who wrote about a fresh, community-based approach to city building, advocating “mixed-use” urban development and challenging traditional approaches that blamed high density for crime, filth, and a long list of other problems. Jacobs considered high concentrations of people vital for city life: A critical mass of people is capable of supporting more vibrant communities. To Jacobs, the ideal city meant diversity; mixed uses, short blocks, buildings old and new and in different states of repair and density. New York City’s Greenwich Village was her version of a vibrant urban community.

Once again, we stand at a crossroads. In one direction lies business as usual, the road we have traveled for decades. The other path leads to a far brighter future. We cannot wait for some future generation to make this change. We need a revolution in humanitarian values. Only then can we hope to create a more stable basis for world peace. Mahatma Gandhi said, “Be the change you wish to see in the world.”
———————————————————

[Glen Hiemstra is the Founder of Futurist.com, and curator of Dothefuture.com. Dennis Walsh is a sustainability futurist from Canada best known for his work as the first publisher of green@work. Contact us through futurist.com]

Continue Reading & Comment »

September 1st, 2012 | By Glen Hiemstra | Posted in Cities Book | Comments Off

The city, the future, and you – rocking the city

This is Part 3 of Chapter 2 of our book on the future of cities, being written with Dennis Walsh. Our plan is to publish a new book blog nearly every day for the next couple of months. We will publish them both here on futurist.com and on dothefuture.com. Later we will compile the blogs into an e-book.

We are debating the eventual title. We started with two choices: “Downtown” and “Shine…The Rebirth of American Cities.” Which do you like? We hope you will find the subject of interest and follow this book in serial form. A reader has suggested, “City Transformation?” So far, “Downtown” with a subtitle is leading. What do you think?

—————————————————-
CHAPTER TWO – Part 3
by Dennis Walsh and Glen Hiemstra

It was the decade of rock n’ roll. Elvis Presley sang “Heartbreak Hotel” popularizing black music and shocking America. The Ed Sullivan Show brought him millions of fans. Superstar rocker, he was here to stay. Chuck Berry, Little Richard, Fats Domino followed him. Accused of promoting teenage sexual liberation and rebellion, Rebel Without a Cause showed teenagers fighting with switchblades and driving fast cars off cliffs.

By the end of the 1950’s, television was everywhere. Television was mesmerizing. Watching it was a favorite pastime. Mass culture delivered mass audiences exactly what they wanted; a “vanilla wasteland” of endless soaps, sitcoms, and Westerns. Advertising agencies used psychologists to influence peoples’ subconscious preference for one product over another. People bought in and paid out. But buying cost money, so along came the credit card. “Buying now, and paying later” made it all too easy.

Did that have a negative effect on America? Did it destroy sense of community? Ironically, the “boob tube” brought the country together watching political conventions and sports teams from home while commercials sold them products that kept the economy moving.

This is where it all gets a little strange, even creepy like deja vu. Students from mostly affluent families flocked to universities in record numbers, and began to see society differently. They saw problems developing. They were questioning rampant materialism. Sound familiar? That generation wanted personal revelation and social revolution; valued intuition as well as reason; and preferred Eastern mysticism to Western religion. In the midst of all of this, a radical, new student organization was born: The Students for a Democratic Society (SDS). Their manifesto, The Port Huron Statement, presented a vision for post Vietnam War America and called for a student movement based on “participatory democracy”, a phenomenon that is still practiced on American campuses to this day. SDS demonstrations against the war drew thousands whose parents – raised during the Great Depression – had sought security and stability through material “stuff” and found it in the suburbs. Universities were in a position of social influence; a harbinger of reform in an apathetic, materialistic society.

The Berkeley Free Speech Movement began in 1964 when Berkeley University students returned to school after a summer of civil rights protests. Students demanded the same structure for their universities as they had for the nation: participatory democracy. The 1960s that followed saw social turmoil creeping in, inspired by the Vietnam War, racial injustice, fear of nuclear annihilation, and materialism. In search of a better world, music, politics, and alternative lifestyles created a counterculture.

So hippies came into play, mostly middle-class white students, wearing jeans, tie-dyed shirts, sandals, beards and long hair. The sex and drug culture was born. Rock music embraced sexual promiscuity and recreational drugs. Bands like The Jefferson Airplane and the Beatles sang songs like “White Rabbit” and “Lucy in the Sky With Diamonds.” In Detroit, Motown soul music combined love songs with music that promoted civil rights and the fight for equality. Motown was the sound of teenage America. The Supremes; the Temptations and Four Tops; and Marvin Gaye, Mary Wells, and Little Stevie Wonder made music of hope.

A black American minister, Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. stood up for what he knew was right. The country moved toward a more open inclusive society that celebrated diversity instead of conformity. Sit-ins were staged at schools and lunch counters. Any public place would do, pretty much. Publicity and popular opinion did the rest. It was perhaps the first time in American history that a generation of youth made an impact on politics and society. Great story but it didn’t end there. Civil rights might have been driven by a sense of peaceful revolution in the 1960’s, but in time, that unrest exploded into violence.

The Watts Riots of 1965 and then the 1968 Detroit riots that followed the assassination of Dr. King, focused attention on the growing problems of poverty and inequality in cities. Against this cultural backdrop, cities were indeed beginning to fail. City centers emptied of residents, home only to office blocks and gradually failing storefronts. Centers of manufacturing continued to flourish into the early 1970’s, but by then the signs of industrial down sizing had begun to occur. Suburbs grew, freeways expanded, bus and rail lines died, the great hollowing out of cities was reaching completion. Some hippies dropped out and left cities for the countryside, experimenting with a communal lifestyle. Away from urban problems, they built lives around shared political goals and organic farming.

As the counterculture wave continued toward the close of the decade, the Woodstock Music and Art Fair became an affair to remember for tens of thousands of middle-class young. Four days of “peace, love and groovy,” of great music, liberation, and expanding consciousness, along with a dose of sex, drugs and indulgence.

Young people didn’t end racism but they did end legal segregation. They ended the notion that you could send half-a-million soldiers around the world to fight a war that people didn’t support. They ended the idea that women are second-class citizens. They made the environment an issue that could not be avoided. For the first time, young people felt empowered by their numbers, proving once and for all that people who care enough to do right can change history.
———————————————————

[Glen Hiemstra is the Founder of Futurist.com, and curator of Dothefuture.com. Dennis Walsh is a sustainability futurist from Canada best known for his work as the first publisher of green@work. Contact us through futurist.com]

Continue Reading & Comment »

August 31st, 2012 | By Glen Hiemstra | Posted in Cities Book | Comments Off

The city, the future, and you – beyond conformity

This is Part 2 of Chapter 2 of our book on the future of cities, being written with Dennis Walsh. Our plan is to publish a new book blog nearly every day for the next couple of months. We will publish them both here on futurist.com and on dothefuture.com. Later we will compile the blogs into an e-book.

We are debating the eventual title. We started with two choices: “Downtown” and “Shine…The Rebirth of American Cities.” Which do you like? We hope you will find the subject of interest and follow this book in serial form. A reader has suggested, “City Transformation?” So far, “Downtown” with a subtitle is leading. What do you think?

—————————————————-
CHAPTER TWO – Part 2
by Dennis Walsh and Glen Hiemstra

Will the future be any different than the past? Will we continue to dream of cars as we dream of lovers? Will they always express our fantasies; fulfill our desires? Or will they become a distant memory like the horse and buggy?

America’s love affair with cars began as soon as they were invented. As Americans were lured to the suburbs, the construction of better highways made the transition possible. The Sunday drive became a peculiarly American phenomenon. The affair matured into a marriage, then became an addiction. Until just the past couple of years Americans drove more every year. To be without a car in the United States is to be almost in exile.

Millions of men moved seamlessly from the regimentation and conformity of the armed forces in World War II to the corporations that were rapidly growing with the American economy. They endured the endless frustration of conforming, of being trapped in the corporate rat race day after day, only to return every evening to a house in the suburbs. Fifties conformity meant long rows of new, identical prefabricated suburban houses; the acceptance of a uniform set of home appliances and very little social unrest. It was a time of intolerance for difference.

Conformity had its price. Beneath the calm image of the suburbs for those left stranded during the day there existed a growing sense of desperate isolation from the rest of the world. Women, housewives were stranded miles away from their families and friends they had grown up with in the city.

The United States in the 1950’s was a culture of contradictions, even in the midst of conformity a “something for everyone” culture flourished in the paradoxical era of Eisenhower era. Comic books entertained the young, rock n’ roll encouraged rebellion and defiant sexuality, while television dulled the mind. That time came to an end in the 1960s and today it is happening again in the midst of a profound shift in America’s social mood, a shift that will match and reflect your personality. This shift will focus on the needs of the community more than the individual.

The cities that realize that have begun the cultural and economic changes that will redefine them in the competitive new world to come. The new competitiveness will mean that cities must become great. And that kind of greatness will take resilience and sustainability. We are at a turning point with our species but time is running out. Cities cannot continue to grow and operate without being sustainable. Future cities may be more dangerous, less peaceful, and more polluted in 20 years. But they do not have to be.

Unlike your parents and grandparents who may have devoted their lives to a career and conformity, you will put lifestyle, family and friends above work and be drawn to the places you want to live rather than to work You and I have a responsibility to change the world. You (and your generation) have the motivation and power to do just that. To be truly great cities will need money and talent. It is no wonder that cities are trying to make themselves attractive to you. Everywhere cities are broken, or on the path to transformation, plain and simple. You will be the ones to transform them. The word revolution catches the spirit of what lies ahead. It is your time to shine.
———————————————————

[Glen Hiemstra is the Founder of Futurist.com, and curator of Dothefuture.com. Dennis Walsh is a sustainability futurist from Canada best known for his work as the first publisher of green@work. Contact us through futurist.com]

Continue Reading & Comment »

August 30th, 2012 | By Glen Hiemstra | Posted in Cities Book | Comments Off

The city, the future, and you – futurama

This year Canadian futurist and writer Dennis Walsh and I began a conversation about a book on the future of cities. As the conversation continued the concept moved toward a discussion of cities but more so of the personal choices we face if we are to make cities and by extension the planet a sustainable place to live. These choices loom large for young people as they shape their own lives, and, we hope, save the future. Now we are writing, and have decided to release the first draft of the book as a blog serial. This is part 1 of Chapter 2. Our plan is to publish a new book blog nearly every day for the next couple of months. We will publish them both here on futurist.com and on dothefuture.com. Later we will compile the blogs into an e-book.

We are debating the eventual title. We started with two choices: “Downtown” and “Shine…The Rebirth of American Cities.” Which do you like? We hope you will find the subject of interest and follow this book in serial form. A reader has suggested, “City Transformation.” So far, “Downtown” with a subtitle is leading. What do you think?

—————————————————-
CHAPTER TWO – Part 1
by Dennis Walsh and Glen Hiemstra

In the America of our memories we think of ourselves as a rural people, a pioneer people, a country of courageous loners heading off into the wilderness to carve out a new place. We dream this dream of the past although even the early immigrant settlers gathered in villages and towns as much as they lived on lonely homesteads.

The anti-urban bias in our history is very old. Thomas Jefferson derided cities as “sores.” Tracing mistrust of cities all the way back to George Washington and Benjamin Franklin, the historian Thomas Bender has written: “Are cities American? Yes and no. Cities and their populations have never been completely excluded from the promise of American life, but neither have they yet been wholly accepted.”

Perhaps they have never been wholly accepted, but cities have always been growing larger. By 1900, while 60% of Americans lived in rural areas, New York housed over 1.4 million people, Chicago 1.7 million, Philadelphia 1.3 million. As the 20th Century dawned the first urban explosion was just beginning. The final industrial revolution was drawing people like a magnet from the country to the city. By 1920 New York had ballooned to 5.6 million, Chicago to 2.7 million, Philadelphia to 1.8 million. There were over 20 cites in the U.S with populations over 300,000 by the end of that second decade of the 20th Century.

The future – if we are to have one worth living – belongs to you, the younger generation. It is time to get ready; time to make critical choices like, “how are you going to spend the rest of your life”, “where will you live”, “what work will you chose”.

It has been said that you can’t know where you’re going until you know where you’ve been. The past is not a map to where you are going, it’s a record of where you have been. A map of the past can serve you by reminding you of lessons learned so you can avoid them in the future. Where better to look than to the auto industry?

With the Roaring ‘20’s, the automobile era was underway, changing the nature of cities dramatically. By 1940 Detroit and Los Angeles, each a creature of the auto age and each with more than 1.5 million residents, had replaced Cleveland and St. Louis among the five largest of U.S. cities and 56% of Americans had settled in urban areas. The nation had become a collection of cities.

It is this later history of American cities and culture that we want to explore next, the period of 1940 up to more recent days. It was the cultural dynamics of these years, more than any other period that shaped the cities that you have inherited.

The ultimate suburban dream began, arguably, at the New York World’s Fair of 1939 and ’40. “Highways and Horizons,” better known as “Futurama,” was overwhelmingly the fair’s most popular exhibit; perhaps 10 percent of the American population saw it. At the heart of the exhibit was a scale model, covering an area about the size of a football field, that showed what American cities and towns might look like in 1960.

Visitors watched matchbox-sized cars zip down wide highways. Gone were the crowded tenements of the time; 1960s Americans would live in stand-alone houses with spacious yards and attached garages. By todays standards, the exhibit would not impress us, but at the time, it inspired wonder. E. B. White wrote in Harper’s, “A ride on the Futurama … induces approximately the same emotional response as a trip through the Cathedral of St. John the Divine … I didn’t want to wake up.”

Just six years later World War II came to an end and millions of the displaced were more or less resettled. European and Asian cities began to be rebuilt from ashes and piles of rubble. Ironically, the most destructive war in history brought about the emergence of the strongest and biggest economy in the world. Some feared that the end of the War would lead the United States back to depression. Today, others argue that the country’s participation in World War II finally saved it from the Great Depression. It makes better sense that way. After all, the entire economy was propelled by war. By 1950, the United States economy was growing rapidly.

While most major economies were slow to recover, war placed the United States at an advantage over both its allies and its enemies. World War II accelerated the pace of change, in weaponry, transportation, communications, electronics, medicine, and technology. The War provided opportunities that would later be manifested. America’s products went overseas. That in-itself was an introduction to new markets and a taste of what would later become known as globalization.

War recruited millions of Americans to the “front”. Factories were built to produce guns and ammunitions, military transport, tanks, fighter planes and bombers. Investments were made in defense of the country. Fuelled by billions in government spending, industry hired hundreds of thousands of workers in major factories. Jobs gave life to industries. And for the first time, women were given the opportunity to work outside the home to participate in nation building.

Americans hoped for much and achieved much. We put our faith in institutions, social and political. That both strengthened and shook us, often at the same time and sometimes by the same events. The war changed everything. Victory brought confidence, in the government and the economy. And consumer demand spurred growth. The newspaper business, the agriculture industry, transport, automobile, aviation, electronics, housing and even Hollywood prospered. New homes meant furniture and appliances as well as new cars.

An acute post-war housing shortage had developed when millions of veterans came home, got married, and started families. The primary solution to this problem was to make futurama real. When you explore an historic city you can find suburbs that existed even centuries ago – often houses on the hill from which people commuted to the town center by foot, cart or horse. But nothing matched the scale of the new suburbs. Invented by William J. Levitt, who applied Henry Ford’s mass production techniques for cars to building homes, the new Levittowns broke the mold on city building. He divided home construction into 27 separate steps, each one being handled by a separate team specializing in that step. The modern suburb was born.

Post-war prosperity in the economy further encouraged suburban growth. With higher wages and lower interest rates, Americans could afford to live in newer residential developments farther away from urban areas. In 1940, over half of the U.S. population resided in rural or densely populated areas, whereas only 15% lived in suburban areas.

Americans were sold, and quit eagerly bought notions of workers escaping the noise, crime and pollution of city life to the perceived calm of the suburbs. Zoning ordinances separated residential development from commercial and industrial. A type of segregation removed people from where they worked, shopped and recreated, making the automobile indispensable. As Americans were lured to the suburbs, the construction of better highways made the transition possible.

The Federal Housing Administration and Veterans Administration loan programs in the years following the Second World War provided mortgages for over eleven million new homes. These mortgages, which typically cost less per month than paying rent, were directed at new single-family suburban construction. Intentionally or not, the FHA and VA programs discouraged the renovation of existing housing stock, while turning their back on the construction of row houses, mixed-use buildings, and other urban housing types.

With the post-WWII boom in home construction under way, in 1953 President Eisenhower appointed the then-president of General Motors, Charles Wilson, as Secretary of Defense and DuPont’s chief, Secretary of Transportation (DuPont was GM’s biggest investor). These two set out to pave over America for the auto. DuPont got Eisenhower to set up the Highway Trust Fund that funneled gasoline tax money into highway construction. Two thirds of these funds went to build inner-city freeways. Meanwhile, GM, recognizing the limits of bus sales as contrasted with automobiles, changed its tactics, and convinced the House of Representatives to deny all funding for public transportation, hoping to reduce bus service. The money was diverted to freeways. By the 1950′s buses were disappearing and everyone was opting for a car. While post-war Europe and Japan were rebuilding their rail transit, America was destroying hers.
———————————————————

[Glen Hiemstra is the Founder of Futurist.com, and curator of Dothefuture.com. Dennis Walsh is a sustainability futurist from Canada best known for his work as the first publisher of green@work. Contact us through futurist.com]

Continue Reading & Comment »

Page 17 of 95« First...10...1516171819...304050...Last »