<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Future of Technology &#8211; Twitter and a webcast archive</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.futurist.com/2009/03/26/future-of-technology-twitter-and-a-webcast-archive/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.futurist.com/2009/03/26/future-of-technology-twitter-and-a-webcast-archive/</link>
	<description>This is the blog of Glen Hiemstra, futurist speaker, keynote speaker, futurist consultant, and Founder of futurist.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Dec 2011 22:36:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Whither Twitter? &#124; stagesofpresence.com</title>
		<link>http://www.futurist.com/2009/03/26/future-of-technology-twitter-and-a-webcast-archive/comment-page-1/#comment-205889</link>
		<dc:creator>Whither Twitter? &#124; stagesofpresence.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2011 03:23:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.futurist.com/?p=1488#comment-205889</guid>
		<description>[...] has an interesting blog about Twitter where he explores whether Twitter is &#8220;the next big thing, or tipping point to a meaning-free [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] has an interesting blog about Twitter where he explores whether Twitter is &#8220;the next big thing, or tipping point to a meaning-free [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Glen Hiemstra</title>
		<link>http://www.futurist.com/2009/03/26/future-of-technology-twitter-and-a-webcast-archive/comment-page-1/#comment-140193</link>
		<dc:creator>Glen Hiemstra</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 15:12:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.futurist.com/?p=1488#comment-140193</guid>
		<description>USA Today, April 15, 2009 issue, Life Style section page 1 has a lead article, &quot;Relationships in a twist over Twitter.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>USA Today, April 15, 2009 issue, Life Style section page 1 has a lead article, &#8220;Relationships in a twist over Twitter.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Whither Twitter? &#171; Stages of Presence</title>
		<link>http://www.futurist.com/2009/03/26/future-of-technology-twitter-and-a-webcast-archive/comment-page-1/#comment-139760</link>
		<dc:creator>Whither Twitter? &#171; Stages of Presence</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 22:37:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.futurist.com/?p=1488#comment-139760</guid>
		<description>[...] has an interesting blog about Twitter where explores whether Twitter is &#8220;the next big thing, or tipping point to a meaning-free [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] has an interesting blog about Twitter where explores whether Twitter is &#8220;the next big thing, or tipping point to a meaning-free [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Glen Hiemstra</title>
		<link>http://www.futurist.com/2009/03/26/future-of-technology-twitter-and-a-webcast-archive/comment-page-1/#comment-135268</link>
		<dc:creator>Glen Hiemstra</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 22:56:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.futurist.com/?p=1488#comment-135268</guid>
		<description>Interesting way to look at it - you are your own audience.  My young colleague, Kanna Hudson (she does our millennial gen stuff) calls it &quot;ambient intimacy&quot; - which is kind of like being at a party, where you&#039;re aware of what everyone is doing, but you&#039;re not directly engaging with everyone all the time. &quot;  See her blog at millennialGeneration.org.  This is another nice image.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting way to look at it &#8211; you are your own audience.  My young colleague, Kanna Hudson (she does our millennial gen stuff) calls it &#8220;ambient intimacy&#8221; &#8211; which is kind of like being at a party, where you&#8217;re aware of what everyone is doing, but you&#8217;re not directly engaging with everyone all the time. &#8221;  See her blog at millennialGeneration.org.  This is another nice image.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aurelio D'Amico</title>
		<link>http://www.futurist.com/2009/03/26/future-of-technology-twitter-and-a-webcast-archive/comment-page-1/#comment-135224</link>
		<dc:creator>Aurelio D'Amico</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 14:48:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.futurist.com/?p=1488#comment-135224</guid>
		<description>A tweet is always read at least ones: from its writer. Who the writer is writing to? No one and everyone.  Is all this meaningless? Meaning is a fabricated concept. There is no such thing. Twitter is the closest thing to a “collective consciousness” which is meaningless by nature. 
The proverbial tree falling without witnesses shows you how much powerful text is (you can write about a paradox you’ll never be able to solve) and twitter is all about text: still the most powerful communication technology out there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A tweet is always read at least ones: from its writer. Who the writer is writing to? No one and everyone.  Is all this meaningless? Meaning is a fabricated concept. There is no such thing. Twitter is the closest thing to a “collective consciousness” which is meaningless by nature.<br />
The proverbial tree falling without witnesses shows you how much powerful text is (you can write about a paradox you’ll never be able to solve) and twitter is all about text: still the most powerful communication technology out there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

