Futurist Speaker Glen Hiemstra: Outlook 2009

by Glen Hiemstra on 23/12/08 at 4:47 pm |   

Outlook 2009

Watch the video of my Outlook for 2009 as a futurist, speaker, and consultant.

This is my final blog entry of 2008, before we take a couple of weeks off. I am cautiously optimistic about 2009. This may surprise you. Here is why.

Future of EEE – Economy, Energy, Environment

Economy: When I recorded Outlook 2008 in December of 2007, I predicted that the economic slump driven by the debt crisis would be worse than experts were suggesting at that time. In fact I had just heard Steve Forbes say in a speech that the debt crisis would be a minor inconvenience in 2008 involving a couple of billion dollars and was nothing to worry about. But of course it was a huge iceberg, into which we have crashed.

However, all is not lost for 2009. The key drivers in how the world deals with the economic crisis will be 1) the amount of the U.S. stimulus (plus that of other nations), 2) more importantly how this stimulus is applied, and 3) the psychological impact of the new U.S. administration. As it looks now the stimulus package(s) will be very large by historical standards, and critically, will be applied in the U.S. to job-creating endeavors rather than simply being poured into banks as most of the money so far has been. Assuming the money can get flowing to real projects the impact will begin to be felt by year end.

The psychological and emotional impact of a new direction is generally underestimated at this time. Last night I saw video of the election celebration in Grant Park, Chicago, on November 4, 2008. While not all shared in celebrating the Obama victory, I do not think we can accurately calculate how large the positive feeling will be when the new administration finally takes office and begins communicating its full plans.

When combined, these three drivers – amount of stimulus, its application, and psychological uplift will, I believe lead to such increased confidence that the economy will turn faster than assumed by the end of the year. This applies particularly to consumer and equity markets.

The housing market is another matter, as we have far to go before housing values match actual incomes. It is in the housing arena along with transportation that we face an important realization. The recovery that begins in 2009 will not return us to business as usual but to a new kind of economy, one that is more modest, more sustainable, and more equitable. If this is not the direction we go, then things will get worse instead of better, for the long run.

Energy: In Outlook 2008, I suggested that we’d see $140 oil by mid-year, which we did, followed by falling prices. But no-one, including me, anticipated a crash in prices like we have seen. Now, however, it appears more likely that by the end of 2009 we will see oil prices climbing to $80 rather than falling further or staying stable. In fact, do not be shocked if by the end of 2009 we are again talking about, if not quite yet seeing, $200 oil. The simple fact is that discovery and development of new oil does not keep pace with oil usage, and has not since the 1970’s. The slightest increase in economic activity will shift prices upward again, while for the time being new investment is stalled.

Environment: The new U.S. administration promises a sharp turn in environmental policy, toward paying attention to climate change. We will see lots of positive action within the stimulus plan and via general investment, in making the built environment more sustainable (retro-fitting public buildings, schools), taking steps to enhance the electricity grid for increased used of solar and wind power, and we will see more breakout activity in nanotech solar energy.

Future of Health Care

The U.S. economy cannot fully recover until and unless the health care crisis in the U.S. is addressed. This crisis includes 50 million uninsured, and health care expenses which on average are up to two times those of the rest of the industrial world, for quality of care that by many measure is no better. The underlying issue is that U.S. health insurance is still mostly attached to employment. Lose your job, lose your insurance. Individual policies are hard to get, and very expensive, as much as $12,000-15,000 per year. In addition, U.S. employers are burdened with the expense, in comparison to international competitors, as we can see in the comparison of U.S. auto makers to their competitors.

Here is the critical issue for 2009. Health care reform will be at the head of the table. But, I was there in 1992-1993, early in my futurist work, when health care reform failed under the Clintons. It failed because the entrenched professional lobbies fought it off. The same result will occur in 2009 and beyond, if the current terms of the health care debate do not change.

The one item so far claimed to be “off the table” is universal coverage in the form of something like Medicare for all. If the policy debate is formulated only around re-arranging the pieces in the health care system, and not fundamentally changing the players, do not expect much change. What deserves at least serious exploration is a Medicare for all approach, with private companies providing supplemental insurance, and removal of health insurance as an employer expectation. I do not know that such a system can ever be designed and approved in the U.S., but it ought to be considered.

Future Technology

The most exciting tech areas in 2009 will be 1) continued development in mobile Internet, via the array of phones now accessing the net along with nearly universal wireless access, and 2) growth in touch and gesture based interfaces, as with iPhones, the HP touch screen and the Microsoft surface computing initiative. Expect more and more Internet access to be mobile and touch/gesture based.
***************************************************************

Glen Hiemstra, futurist speaker, is the author of Turning the Future Into Revenue: What Businesses and Individuals Need to Know to Shape Their Futures, from John Wiley & Sons, publisher, 2006. Glen is the Founder and Owner of Futurist.com, a website in the public interest, a blogger, consultant, and Internet video host. He lives and works in Kirkland, Washington, providing presentation, consultation, and research services. For more information contact: www.futurist.com
***************************************************************



Print This Post Print This Post

7 Responses to “Futurist Speaker Glen Hiemstra: Outlook 2009”

  1. Ken Steinberg

    Jan 13th, 2009

    Glen,

    All good points….thought I would add a couple additional factors to consider.

    * There is a lot of discussion about stimulus and the US economy “returning to normal”. What needs to be understood is that normal will not be what we had prior. Normal will include some readjustment which should allow the US to settle into a more reasonable GDP. Real Estate had us on a false valuation plateau.

    * While the stimulus is welcomed, the lenders are clearly still not putting money on the street. I have seen this first had with the severe lending practices being exercise on Main St America. That being said, a return to normalcy will be driven by the shear prospect of renewing disposable goods. Middle Americans will cut back on the credit and spending for the short term until mid-summer when they will need to start replenishing durable goods. This will increase demand for blue chip goods. Job growth will lag that gentle uptick probably by another 6 months. With that, the stock market. The $2 Trillion lost will probably see a 50% recovery in value.

    * Energy, don’t forget Steven Chu’s preclusion for energy based on renewable resources. A big focus for him…

    * Tech : look for the netbook bubble to burst in 12 months as they do not represent long term viable corporate technology but you are right to highlight touch-based tech and mobile. This should really move now that China’s FCC has activated/auctioned new frequencies…

    Keep up the great work. Fantastic read.
    Regards
    Ken

  2. Jan Neumeister

    Feb 28th, 2009

    @1:

    “look for the netbook bubble to burst in 12 months as they do not represent long term viable corporate technology”

    Could you please clarify this claim, I’m not sure what do you mean by the bursting bubble.

  3. Glen Hiemstra

    Mar 1st, 2009

    Jan. This is not a statement that I made…perhaps you heard it somewhere else. I said that netbooks are a growth area. But they are not and will not become a big enough growth area to become a bubble. As to whether they represent viable corporate technology, I would think not, except for those who travel and want to travel light. Having said that, jump ahead 10 years, with traditional increases in computing power, compactness, storage capacity, and so on, and a device the size of a netbook will contain more than most people will need. Except for the size of the screen and the size of the keyboard, which are cramped. A built-in projector would help with the screen size issue, though not be useful in many locations.

  4. Jan Neumeister

    Mar 4th, 2009

    Glen, I think that netbooks are a great alternative for size and price-conscious users. Battery life is at about 7 hours already with the new Asus line and is probably going to be even higher in the near future, which will make these small machines a great thing to have when you need to travel with a light load somewhere outside of civilization.

    Next, there are graphic units already in some, which allows video-computing, leisure gaming and so on, which captures another segment.

    Lastly, the low price is likely to attract mainstream web-surfers and document-writers in these tough economic times so based on these premises, my own opinion is that netbooks are likely to canibalize a high portion of current notebook’s market shares.

  5. Glen Hiemstra

    Mar 5th, 2009

    Jan, this is a great overview of some features of net books. Today while flying and reading USA Today I saw an article on a netbook that has detachable magnetic-backed screen – you can stick it to the refrigerator with or without keyboard when you are not carrying it around. Pretty neat.

  6. Bob Merritt

    May 1st, 2009

    What Netbooks have established is that consumers are happy with a portable computing device that supports a much lower level of performance than the traditional PC industry wants to supply. The issue is whether Moore’s Law has driven the costs of supplying an adequate amount of processing power far below what can be profitably supported with business models that competed with full service desktops and high-end notebooks.

    If the concept that consumers can find adequate levels of personal computing at significantly lower cost doesn’t support the “long-term viable corporate technology” of the traditional market leaders, I think it is the corporate technology and infrastructure of those companies that is at risk.

    Whether you call them Netbooks or CULV-based notebooks, the genie is out of the bottle. A growing percentage of consumers now know that they do not have to pay what they have paid in the past in order to get acceptable levels of personal computing services, and I don’t think that trend can be reversed.

  7. glen Hiemstra

    May 1st, 2009

    Bob, very interesting observations. Brenda Cooper, affiliated with Futurist.co, bought her netbook and loves it. You raise challenging issue – it seems like good idea for consumer, but will margins be so small that industry will not, cannot fully support a shift in this direction?

Leave a Reply